I did some work on the Hanne Flakenberg Plisse jacket on Sunday:
This is the back, or part of it. The texture stitch and the intriguing method of construction keep this project interesting. All for now. But at least I got a bit of knitting done...
Well, that was the shortest vacation ever, hands down. At least, for this family: 20 hours. (that's minus the car time) The good news is, we have a good buyer for our house, after 4 months on the market. The bad news is we had to race home in order to figure out what we would buy instead, due to a very tight time constraint. One wonders why it had to be at the start and not the end of vacation but so be it. So guess what! Not only did I not finish those sleeves, I ripped what I had done, and started over. Here's why: Without really thinking about it, I had automatically picked up sts for the sleeve (which gets knit down from the shoulder to the cuff) the way I always do: in a stitch. Problem is, here you want the continuity from the yoke to the sleeve to appear unbroken, and that half stitch of red showed. I know, it's hard to see in this photo, but believe me, it was bad. Maybe this shows it better>> See what I mean? That bad baby got ripped out and it has now been w...
I am not going to show you the feeble amount of knitting I did yesterday. I have a total of 10 minutes daily for knitting, if that, and, well, it's just too dull. Since Nancy and I see eye to eye on knitting books (thanks Nancy, and I remember you quite well!)-- I am packing up my Stay With Me" knitting books box. It is almost full, and there are some Meg books not in yet. (I need to have a conversation with Meg about sizing her books to properly fit into my book carton.) And what do I do about my already-down-to-the-absolute-necessities lace books? To say nothing of the precious and challenging-to-replace AS books? (Notice I do not have Aran Knitting. I cannot bring myself to pay the prices demanded, and when it came out I was a newly married support-wonderful-DH -thru-Law School kind of gal and $39 or whatever it was was a lot of money to me. Hm. So is 300, for that matter. Anyway, my library still has it, and no I won't tell you which one since all the other librari...
Not having any knitting progress to share (sorry. I did knit my sock flap but that's about all)... I wanted to get on my needle soapbox for a bit. As you can see, I own a fair number of needle gauges. I love them. They let me keep my needles logical, despite all of the manufacturers' apparent efforts to befuddle me. I trained as a scientist, which generally pursues accuracy. Thus, two needles that claim to be the same size but are in reality .25 or even .5 mm off-- well. How can a manufacturer claim to have an accurate tool, that can vary so widely? (Example: US size 6 can be 4mm or 4.25mm) Can you see a scientist accepting a .25mm variation in his calipers? I know that for manufacturers to be super accurate they'd need to really hike their prices into the ozone. But couldn't they at least agree on which mm size to aim for? Better yet, can the whacko size systems, and just use millimeter sizes exclusively. They are utterly logical. Don't get me wrong, I never...
Comments